The Jesuit Teachings of the Eastern Question

In Part 4 of this eye-opening series on the Middle East in prophecy, MacKenzie Drebit, Tabea Drebit, Wendy Goubej, and Jacob Downs respond to common objections about the literal interpretation of Daniel 11. Is Turkey really in prophecy? Was Uriah Smith teaching false ideas influenced by Jesuit futurism? The panel goes back to early Adventist sources and shows how the pioneers used a consistent, Bible-based method supported by Ellen White and William Miller’s rules of interpretation.

As more people turn to spiritual or symbolic interpretations, the team gives a serious warning: vague or mystical views of prophecy can lead to confusion and deception. They explain how this trend started in the 1940s and why it weakens the Adventist message. Instead of replacing the papacy in prophecy, the literal view adds important details and strengthens our understanding of end-time events—without ignoring the role of Rome.

This final part ends with a strong call to action. Are we willing to follow the truth no matter what it costs? Are we prepared to stand when the last test comes? The panel reminds us that truth must be accepted by faith, not by waiting to see events happen. If we don’t follow what the Bible clearly teaches now, we may be too late when the crisis arrives. Don’t miss this important study—and bring your Bible.